Alain Zidouemba
2016-07-14 12:25:57 UTC
We usually acknowledge every community signature submission, and even work
with submitters to tweak the signature if needed.
I see that you submitted a few signatures in the past few hours, which we
will acknowledge and review in a few hours. If there are signatures that
you've submitted in the past that we did not acknowledge, they somehow have
fallen through the cracks and I sincerely apologize for that. If you could
be so kind to point them out, we'll let you know what their status is.
Thanks,
- Alain
On Thursday, July 14, 2016, Arnaud Jacques / SecuriteInfo.com <
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
with submitters to tweak the signature if needed.
I see that you submitted a few signatures in the past few hours, which we
will acknowledge and review in a few hours. If there are signatures that
you've submitted in the past that we did not acknowledge, they somehow have
fallen through the cracks and I sincerely apologize for that. If you could
be so kind to point them out, we'll let you know what their status is.
Thanks,
- Alain
On Thursday, July 14, 2016, Arnaud Jacques / SecuriteInfo.com <
Hello Joel,
have *no news* from them.
Did they pass false positive tests ? Are they wrong ? Will they be
published one day ? Do Clamav want
better detection ratio ? If yes, the minimum is to provide news for
sigmakers that sumbit their signatures
(time and efforts) to community-sigs to be included in official Clamav
databases.
--
Best regards,
Arnaud Jacques
SecuriteInfo.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/pages/SecuriteInfocom/132872523492286
_______________________________________________
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
_______________________________________________You're right. Nothing I said was negative. We know exactly what
happenswhen our testing is done. We don't know in other cases. I didn't say
anything about the quality of 3rd party signatures. In fact, the
qualityanything about the quality of 3rd party signatures. In fact, the
is so good, that's exactly why we are rolling out the program to protect
more people.
I have couple of signatures, handmade, I submited to community-sigs. And Imore people.
have *no news* from them.
Did they pass false positive tests ? Are they wrong ? Will they be
published one day ? Do Clamav want
better detection ratio ? If yes, the minimum is to provide news for
sigmakers that sumbit their signatures
(time and efforts) to community-sigs to be included in official Clamav
databases.
Protecting customers is a good thing. We're always going to try and do
that.
We (third parties) do that too ;)that.
--
Best regards,
Arnaud Jacques
SecuriteInfo.com
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/pages/SecuriteInfocom/132872523492286
_______________________________________________
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml